We came across a very interesting declassified CIA document. It was approved for release in 2003, but comes from the 1980’s.
It’s titled, “Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process.” The document was written for the Commander of the US Army Operational Group in Fort Meade and really dives deep into the holographic universe, out of body experiences, altered states of consciousness and much more.
The focal point of the document is what’s known as “The Gateway Experience.”
The Gateway experience is a ultimately a training system designed to bring enhanced strength, focus and coherence to the amplitude and frequency of brainwave output between left and right hemispheres so as to alter consciousness, moving it outside the physical sphere so as to ultimately escape even the restrictions of time and space.
It’s about information on how to interact with the nonphysical parts of reality. The Gateway Experience was originally created by Robert Monroe, founder of The Monroe institute (TMI).
TMI is arguably the most renowned institute for consciousness studies, and has been assisting people in tapping into the powers of consciousness since 1971.
Did You Know?
Did you know that the US military, and military organizations all over the world have been studying parapsychology for decades? This includes precognition, telepathy, clairvoyance, remote viewing and much more.
It’s quite clear that there has been a very heavy interest in this type of stuff, and there are multiple examples to choose from, by military agencies.
For example, if you go to the CIA’s electronic reading room you can access files on the U.S. Government’s Star Gate Project, it was one of multiple programs within this realm that dealt a lot with the phenomenon of remote viewing, among others.
How successful were these programs? Well, when it comes to remote viewing, which is the ability to describe a remote geographical location and its contents, as well as predicting future events, we have a great quote from 1995 when some of the literature was declassified.
It comes from Dr. Harold E. Puthoff, scientist and co-founder of the program at Stanford.
“To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the (remote viewing) phenomenon.
“Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise… The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions.” (source)
Another very interesting document highlights experiments involving the videotaping and high-speed photography of the transfer of test specimens (nuts, bundles of matches, pills, nails, thread, photosensitive paper, chemically treated paper, sponges dipped in FeCl3, etc.) through the walls of sealed paper envelopes, double layered KCNS-type paper bags, sealed glass bottles and tubes with sealed caps, and sealed plastic film canisters without the walls of any of these containers being breached.
All of the Chinese experiments reported using gifted children and young adults, who possessed well-known extraordinary PK (psychokinetic) ability that allowed them to teleport the various test specimens.
In all the experimental cases that were reported, the test specimens that were teleported were completely unaltered or unchanged from their initial state.
You can access that document and read more about it here.
Here’s another great quote I’d like to share. It comes from Dr. Jessica Utts, the Chair of the Department of Statistics at the University of California, Irvine and a professor there since 2008.
“What convinced me was just the evidence, the accumulating evidence as I worked in this field and I got to see more and more of the evidence.
“I visited the laboratories, even beyond where I was working to see what they were doing and I could see that they had really tight controls… and so I got convinced by the good science that I saw being done.
“And in fact I will say as a statistician I’ve consulted in a lot of different areas of science; the methodology and the controls on these experiments are tighter than any other area of science where I’ve worked.” (source)
Reference: Collective-evolution.com (excerpt)